adblock in CC

[obsy]

Now we have adblock in CC (openwrt/packages@081f255).

Did you consider supporting this package in plugin-gargoyle-adblock?

[lantis1008]

That package is really bloated. Don't get me wrong it's a good
implementation, but it's over the top for what it is. I don't think you
really need a daemon running looking for updates or anything, the lists
just aren't that frequent.
His auto setup of interfaces is nice though.

Did you have anything in particular you wanted from it?

On 17 Mar 2016, at 4:05 AM, Cezary Jackiewicz [email protected]
wrote:

Now we have adblock in CC (openwrt/packages@081f255
openwrt/packages@081f255).

Did you consider supporting this package in plugin-gargoyle-adblock?

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#502

[obsy]

Keep those same solutions without duplicating packages/functionality.

[lantis1008]

I guess so.
I like his firewall implementation better then mine, but it won't play nicely with gargoyle I don't think.

If people think it's worth doing I'll look but I'm not keen.

[ericpaulbishop]

I would be open to having multiple packages with an adblock solution, one that is the old way, one with the new package if you want to create a new plugin based on the openwrt package.

That said, given that Lantis built and is maintaining that plugin, and it isn't part of the core set of packages, I'm going to go with whatever he wants to do for his plugin.