Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SUPPORT: Excluding notes based on path? #262

Open
greenship24 opened this issue Aug 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

SUPPORT: Excluding notes based on path? #262

greenship24 opened this issue Aug 11, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@greenship24
Copy link

greenship24 commented Aug 11, 2024

First off, thank you for this plugin. Recently used it for two trips and overall it was great.

That said, I am wondering how I can accomplish this. I am looking for a way to reuse locations without having to remove old geolocation links.

Basically I have it structured as

  • 2024- Trip 1
  • 2024- Trip 2
  • 2025- Trip XYZ

The 2024 ones would be "archived" in a sense. But I do plan on going back to 1-2 of these locations and would like to use some of their locations in Trip XYZ for 2025. Copying the notes obviously works fine but then I am left with duplicate locations on the map view (necessitating a double click and just a lot of noise while using map view, etc.)

I tried some regex filters and such using "path:''" and the boolean operators but can't seem to filter out the archived trip notes. Same thing using "linkedfrom" with a path regex. Is there an easy way to do this? I feel like there is but when I attempt to layer these filters it doesn't work right and indeed sometimes it gets confused it seems and starts duplicating results (ie. I have 2 notes with these geolocations but then it starts showing 3 results, then 4, etc.)

I think ideally I would change old trips to "Archived- 2024 $tripName" format and then use a filter/query that excludes anything with that style of path and save that as the default view. Just can't seem to work out how to get there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant