You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think when either of these are run locally biomake is smart enough not to run twice.
This is okay for when there is only two outputs but if I have many outputs it becomes in elegant, I think we should be able to get Prolog to infer the correct way to submit the jobs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi this is just a question, but maybe an example in the documentation would be helpful.
If I have a command that produces multiple output files what is the best way to write this. I think If am using the pattern :
['file_00','file_01'] <-- ['starting.file'],'split -l 8 -d -a 2 starting.file file_'.
'go' <-- ['file_01','file_00'].
Running 'biomake -Q pbs go', will I think in the case means that' split' is run twice.
But In the following running 'biomake -Q pbs go2' I think split is only run once.
['file_method2_00'] <-- ['starting.file'],'split -l 8 -d -a 2 starting.file file_method2_'.
['file_method2_01'] <-- ['file_method2_00'].
'go2' <-- ['file_method2_01'].
I think when either of these are run locally biomake is smart enough not to run twice.
This is okay for when there is only two outputs but if I have many outputs it becomes in elegant, I think we should be able to get Prolog to infer the correct way to submit the jobs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: