Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A very powerful plug-in, hope it can replace the calendar plug-in #7

Open
lxmwwl opened this issue Aug 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@lxmwwl
Copy link

lxmwwl commented Aug 30, 2024

No description provided.

@lxmwwl lxmwwl changed the title A very powerful plug-in, I hope it can replace the calendar plug-in A very powerful plug-in, hope it can replace the calendar plug-in Aug 30, 2024
@ftvkyo
Copy link
Owner

ftvkyo commented Aug 30, 2024

Hello.

Thanks for the kind feedback!

At the moment, the plugin's view looks like this:

Screenshot

image

The schedule is generated from this (stripped of unrelated content):

- [ ] Breakfast [time:: 09:20 30m]
- [ ] Lunch [time:: 12:30 1h]
- [ ] [[20240830 Birthday parties]]
    - [ ] Have fun [time:: 16:00 8h]

There is functionality for the 5 levels of periodic notes (with basic templating), and a display of schedule using information from the current daily note (relying on dataview inline fields on the tasks inside)

However, there is no functionality for unique notes anymore.
It was very opinionated and also cumbersome to modify whenever I had to.
I personally came back to descriptive note names, optionally prefixed with date for journal-style entries.
I think it's more important to focus on one thing and do it well in this case, so I focused on the calendar+schedule aspect.

I haven't had the time to update the wiki/readme and other stuff.

If you have any feature requests or thoughts about this, you are very welcome to share them :)
I will find time to sort this out if I see interest.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants