-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tightening dependencies #9860
Labels
Milestone
Comments
|
|
@bep, is there any hope of progress here? As I mentioned in nicksnyder/go-i18n#253, I am hesitant to package the fork because it bears the warning "This is a short-lived fork to fix a critical upstream issue, do not use." |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I maintain the Hugo package for Fedora.
During the packaging process, I have come across a few things that I patch around. I wanted to bring these things to your attention in the hope that you might be able to address them upstream. Should our discussion suggest it, I am happy to create individual merge requests.
Hugo (up to 0.98.0) relies on github.com/clbanning/mxj/v2 v2.5.5. Fedora provides golang-github-clbanning-mxj 2.5.5 (note the lack of the "v2"), and Hugo seems to build just fine against this. Did what was once known as "v2" get merged into the master branch? Can Hugo drop the use of "v2" and simply use the primary release of this package?
Hugo has for some time relied on github.com/gohugoio/go-i18n/v2. The "about" text associated with this repository reads "This is a short-lived fork to fix a critical upstream issue, do not use." Is it possible that Hugo could transition back to the upstream version of this package? Have they fixed the "critical upstream issue".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: