Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use better interchange types than UCalendar for date formatting #1

Open
sffc opened this issue Nov 14, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Use better interchange types than UCalendar for date formatting #1

sffc opened this issue Nov 14, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
discuss before start The issues isn't quite ready to be fixed, there are open questions to be discussed enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@sffc
Copy link

sffc commented Nov 14, 2019

ECMA-402 does not expose the Calendar class, in large part because we are working toward a better representation for dates and times in Temporal. I know pure ICU does not currently support any other good types for inputting to your DateFormat, but perhaps this is a place where you want to consider a wrapper with a more friendly API that hides the UCalendar under the hood.

@filmil
Copy link
Member

filmil commented Nov 14, 2019 via email

@sffc
Copy link
Author

sffc commented Nov 16, 2019

Are you aware of a Rust standard date/time type like java.time, Abseil time, or JavaScript Temporal?

@sffc sffc changed the title Feedback on rust_icu_ucal Use better interchange types than UCalendar for date formatting Nov 16, 2019
@filmil filmil added the enhancement New feature or request label May 8, 2020
@filmil filmil added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Aug 27, 2020
@filmil filmil added the discuss before start The issues isn't quite ready to be fixed, there are open questions to be discussed label Oct 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discuss before start The issues isn't quite ready to be fixed, there are open questions to be discussed enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants