Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 2, 2021. It is now read-only.

Table with suggested FHRS matches with same postcode #65

Open
gregrs-uk opened this issue Apr 18, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Table with suggested FHRS matches with same postcode #65

gregrs-uk opened this issue Apr 18, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@gregrs-uk
Copy link
Owner

gregrs-uk commented Apr 18, 2019

In the table of OSM entities with invalid FHRS IDs for each district, include a column of those FHRS establishments not yet successfully matched which have the same postcode as the OSM entity. Each establishment should be a link to add the appropriate FHRS ID to the OSM entity in JOSM.

Thanks @rjw62 for the suggested method.

@jnicho02
Copy link
Contributor

I'm sure you've realised, these are often where a restaurant has changed hands or closed and another opened. A useful trigger for tasks in Street Complete or similar some time.

@rjw62
Copy link
Contributor

rjw62 commented Apr 18, 2019

@jnicho02 Yes, invalid FHRS IDs are already included in my tool at https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ thanks to a feed from @gregrs-uk . In my experience they seem to be about 50/50 between updated IDs for the same place (which can be fixed remotely using the FHRS data) and changes of name/use (which usually require a ground survey). There have been a couple of cases recently of authorities assigning new numbers to all their registered establishments -- for which the feature suggested above would be very helpful.

@gregrs-uk gregrs-uk changed the title Invalid FHRS IDs table: include suggested FHRS matches with same postcode Table with suggested FHRS matches with same postcode Apr 21, 2019
@gregrs-uk
Copy link
Owner Author

This could also include suggested FHRS matches for OSM nodes/ways which have a matching postcode. I've started coding this in the postcode-matching-table branch, although it doesn't include FHRS mismatches yet.

Given the size of the table, it should probably go on a separate page for each district.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants