-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Not mapped rpb spatial uris #2060
Comments
Hmm, I don't know what is going on here. Here are three observations:
Maybe @fsteeg has an idea. Otherwise, we could put it on the agenda for the Wednesday meeting with LBZ. |
There were some fixes in RPB data regarding the spatial classification in the past and we apparently did not fix Alma/lobid as well. This becomes obvious when looking at a resource that is both in lobid and RPB, e.g. https://rpb.lobid.org/929t01075254?format=json vs. https://lobid.org/resources/990218038960206441?format=json RPB has https://rpb.lobid.org/spatial#n13310 and lobid https://rpb.lobid.org/spatial#n13307 |
This error is embedded in the MARC-Data:
I think that we are not able to fix these errors on our side. |
@acka47 will this be fixed in context of https://github.com/hbz/lbz-vocabs ? |
Yes, we have an issue (hbz/lbz-vocabs#4) and a PR (hbz/lbz-vocabs#6) over there. Thus, closing this one. |
@acka47 are you sure? The LBZ notation is fixed, but the Spatial Notations are not that I hinted: #2060 (comment) I will open an ticket for the missing spatial notations. |
You are right and this issue is all about spatial notations, isn't it? So we should just reopen it. |
I opened an issue here: hbz/lbz-vocabs#8 |
Sorry, we made some mistakes and mis-communication here. These issues won't be fixed by adding new notations to rpb-spatial. In fact, it originated from updating notations in rpb-spatial an not updating Alma data accordingly (while RPB data was updated). The fix will be that LBZ manually adjusts the 359 records. Thus, reopening here and closing over at lbz-vocabs. |
@DorisCollin Hier eine Auflistung der Records samt Fehlerhafter Spatial URIs:
|
Some progress, but 160 still open: http://lobid.org/resources/search?q=spatial.label%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Frpb.lobid.org%2Fspatial%22 I generated dynamic lists for this problem: List of records with details to error. |
@TobiasNx Kannst du für die beiden Listen (die untere im Originalkommentar und die aus #2060 (comment) analog zu hbz/lbz-vocabs#4 (comment) auch dynamische Listen generieren? |
#2060 (comment) already done. |
Ah, super, danke. Hier nochmal auf Deutch für @DorisCollin : Beim dritten Link fehlt noch die Alma MMSId, oder? Kannst du das noch anpassen, @TobiasNx ? |
Hier ist der dritte Link, mit AlmaMmsId. Die komplette Liste der Links |
@acka47 It seems that this ticket is fixed! |
Nice. Closing |
It seems that the there are 359 rpb records with broken rpb spatial info:
http://lobid.org/resources/search?q=spatial.label%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Frpb.lobid.org%2Fspatial%22
E.g.:
http://lobid.org/resources/990365389780206441.json
Is this a RPB issue? @fsteeg @acka47
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: