-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathbib.bib
216 lines (200 loc) · 18.9 KB
/
bib.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
@incollection{fichter_sammelbecken_2017,
location = {{Zürich}},
title = {Ein {{Sammelbecken}} Für {{Populisten}}},
isbn = {978-3-03810-278-6},
booktitle = {Smartphone-{{Demokratie}}: \#{{Fake News}}, \#{{Facebook}}, \#{{Bots}}, \#{{Populismus}}, \#{{Weibo}}, \#{{Civic Tech}}},
series = {NZZ Libro},
publisher = {{NZZ Libro, Neue Zürcher Zeitung}},
date = {2017},
keywords = {Political aspects,Internet,Social media,Democracy},
author = {Brodnig, Ingrid},
editor = {Fichter, Adrienne}
}
@article{engesser_populism_2017,
title = {Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology},
volume = {20},
issn = {1369-118X},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697},
doi = {10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697},
shorttitle = {Populism and Social Media},
abstract = {Populism is a relevant but contested concept in political communication research. It has been well-researched in political manifestos and the mass media. The present study focuses on another part of the hybrid media system and explores how politicians in four countries (AT, CH, IT, UK) use Facebook and Twitter for populist purposes. Five key elements of populism are derived from the literature: emphasizing the sovereignty of the people, advocating for the people, attacking the elite, ostracizing others, and invoking the ‘heartland’. A qualitative text analysis reveals that populism manifests itself in a fragmented form on social media. Populist statements can be found across countries, parties, and politicians’ status levels. While a broad range of politicians advocate for the people, attacks on the economic elite are preferred by left-wing populists. Attacks on the media elite and ostracism of others, however, are predominantly conducted by right-wing speakers. Overall, the paper provides an in-depth analysis of populism on social media. It shows that social media give the populist actors the freedom to articulate their ideology and spread their messages. The paper also contributes to a refined conceptualization and measurement of populism in future studies.},
number = {8},
journaltitle = {Information, Communication \& Society},
urldate = {2018-07-08},
date = {2017-08-03},
pages = {1109-1126},
keywords = {ideology,politics,Populism,qualitative text analysis,social media},
author = {Engesser, Sven and Ernst, Nicole and Esser, Frank and Büchel, Florin},
file = {/Users/josef/Zotero/storage/DP2AUSXU/1369118X.2016.html}
}
@article{ivarsflaten_what_2007,
langid = {english},
title = {What {{Unites Right}}-{{Wing Populists}} in {{Western Europe}}?},
volume = {41},
issn = {0010-4140},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294168},
doi = {10.1177/0010414006294168},
shorttitle = {What {{Unites Right}}-{{Wing Populists}} in {{Western Europe}}?},
abstract = {Unlike for the green party family, no empirically backed scholarly consensus exists about the grievances mobilized by populist right parties in Western Europe. To the contrary, three competing grievance mobilization models can be distinguished in the existing literature. These models focus on grievances arising from economic changes, political elitism and corruption, and immigration. This study discusses these three grievance mobilization models and tests them on comparable cross-sectional survey data for all seven relevant countries using multinomial probit analysis. The study finds that no populist right party performed well in elections around 2002 without mobilizing grievances over immigration. However, it finds several examples of populist right parties experiencing electoral success without mobilizing grievances over economic changes or political elitism and corruption. This study therefore solves a long-standing disagreement in the literature by comprehensively showing that only the appeal on the immigration issue unites all successful populist right parties., Unlike for the green party family, no empirically backed scholarly consensus exists about the grievances mobilized by populist right parties in Western Europe. To the contrary, three competing grievance mobilization models can be distinguished in the existing literature. These models focus on grievances arising from economic changes, political elitism and corruption, and immigration. This study discusses these three grievance mobilization models and tests them on comparable cross-sectional survey data for all seven relevant countries using multinomial probit analysis. The study finds that no populist right party performed well in elections around 2002 without mobilizing grievances over immigration. However, it finds several examples of populist right parties experiencing electoral success without mobilizing grievances over economic changes or political elitism and corruption. This study therefore solves a long-standing disagreement in the literature by comprehensively showing that only the appeal on the immigration issue unites all successful populist right parties.},
number = {1},
journaltitle = {Comparative Political Studies},
shortjournal = {Comparative Political Studies},
urldate = {2018-07-08},
date = {2007},
pages = {3-23},
author = {Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth}
}
@collection{pajnik_populism_2018,
location = {{London ; New York, NY}},
title = {Populism and the {{Web}}: Communicative Practices of Parties and Movements in {{Europe}}},
isbn = {978-1-4724-8932-6},
shorttitle = {Populism and the {{Web}}},
pagetotal = {192},
publisher = {{Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}},
date = {2018},
keywords = {Europe,Political aspects,Internet,Right-wing extremists,Protest movements,Technological innovations,Populism,Communication in politics},
editor = {Pajnik, Mojca and Sauer, Birgit}
}
@article{stier_when_2017-1,
title = {When Populists Become Popular: Comparing {{Facebook}} Use by the Right-Wing Movement {{Pegida}} and {{German}} Political Parties},
volume = {20},
doi = {10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328519},
shorttitle = {When Populists Become Popular},
abstract = {Previous research has acknowledged the use of social media in political communication by right-wing populist parties and politicians. Less is known, however, about its pivotal role for right-wing social movements which rely on personalized messages to mobilize supporters and challenge the mainstream party system. This paper analyzes online political communication by the right-wing populist movement Pegida and German political parties. We investigate to which extent parties attract supporters of Pegida, to which extent they address topics similar to Pegida and whether their topic use has become more similar over a period of almost two years. The empirical analysis is based on Facebook posts by main accounts and individual representatives of these political groups. We first show that there are considerable overlaps in the audiences of Pegida and the new challenger in the party system, AfD. Then we use topic models to characterize topic use by party and surveyed crowdworkers to which extent they perceive the identified topics as populist communication. The results show that while Pegida and AfD talk about rather unique topics and smaller parties engage to varying degrees with the topics populists emphasize, the two governing parties CDU and SPD clearly deemphasize those. Overall, the findings indicate that the considerable attention devoted to populist actors and shifts in public opinion due to the refugee crisis have left only moderate marks in political communication within the mainstream party system.},
journaltitle = {Information, Communication \& Society},
date = {2017-05-29},
pages = {1365-1388},
author = {Stier, Sebastian and Posch, Lisa and Bleier, Arnim and Strohmaier, Markus},
file = {/Users/josef/Zotero/storage/8QH7JHIZ/Stier et al. - 2017 - When populists become popular comparing Facebook .pdf}
}
@inproceedings{bobba_age_2017,
location = {{Oslo}},
title = {The {{Age Of Populism}}? {{An}} Analysis {{Of Facebook Political Communication In Italy}}, {{France}}, {{And Spain}}},
url = {https://ecpr.eu/Events/PaperDetails.aspx?PaperID=35518&EventID=96},
eventtitle = {{{ECPR General Conference}} 2017},
urldate = {2018-07-08},
date = {2017-09-09},
author = {Bobba, Giuliano and Seddone, Antonella and Cremonesi, Christina},
file = {/Users/josef/Zotero/storage/QYQTJPHH/PaperDetails.html}
}
@misc{dittrich_social_2017,
langid = {american},
title = {Social {{Networks}} and {{Populism}} in the {{EU}}},
url = {http://institutdelors.eu/publications/social-networks-and-populism-in-the-eu-comparative-study/?lang=en},
shorttitle = {Social {{Networks}} and {{Populism}} in the {{EU}}},
publisher = {{Jacques Dolors Institut – Berlin}},
urldate = {2018-07-08},
date = {2017-04-24},
author = {Dittrich, Paul-Jasper},
file = {/Users/josef/Zotero/storage/2WMA9SUJ/social-networks-and-populism-in-the-eu-comparative-study.html}
}
@article{salgado_wheres_2018,
langid = {english},
title = {Where’s Populism? {{Online}} Media and the Diffusion of Populist Discourses and Styles in {{Portugal}}},
issn = {1680-4333, 1682-0983},
url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41304-017-0137-4},
doi = {10.1057/s41304-017-0137-4},
shorttitle = {Where’s Populism?},
abstract = {Portuguese politics and mainstream media have been resistant to the recent spread of populism. This article examines the specific features of Portuguese politics and media that might explain the apparent exception, and puts it to test by analysing the prevalence of populist discourses and styles of communication in different types of online media. The sample is composed of mediated and unmediated messages on immigration and corruption, two issues that are commonly present in populist discourses by both right- and left-wing political actors. Overall, the content analysis shows that although populist discourses are not recurrent in politics and media, social media have amplified the visibility of this kind of discourses in Portugal.},
journaltitle = {European Political Science},
shortjournal = {Eur Polit Sci},
urldate = {2018-07-08},
date = {2018-01-22},
pages = {1-13},
author = {Salgado, Susana},
file = {/Users/josef/Zotero/storage/MEPDR5MK/Salgado - 2018 - Where’s populism Online media and the diffusion o.pdf;/Users/josef/Zotero/storage/Z969TTRF/s41304-017-0137-4.html}
}
@incollection{forchtner_mediatization_2013,
langid = {english},
title = {Mediatization, {{Right}}-{{Wing Populism}} and {{Political Campaigning}}: {{The Case}} of the {{Austrian Freedom Party}}},
isbn = {978-1-349-44519-6 978-1-137-27332-1},
url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137273321_10},
shorttitle = {Mediatization, {{Right}}-{{Wing Populism}} and {{Political Campaigning}}},
abstract = {By analysing the discourses and performances of and within the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) since the millennium, 2000, this chapter highlights the role of ‘mediatization’ in the dynamics of right-wing populist political campaigns and their leading narratives and strategies. These are analysed in the context of recent FPÖ politics and campaigning, which extensively utilize, inter alia, rhetorics of Islamophobia (cf.Krzyzanowski and Wodak, 2009; Krzyzanowski, 2012) and discursive strategies of ‘blaming and denying’, ‘saying the unsayable’ and breaking social and political taboos (cf. Wodak and Pelinka, 2002; Wodak, 2006b, 2012, b, c; Engel and Wodak, 2009, 2013; Richardson and Wodak, 2009a, b).},
booktitle = {Media {{Talk}} and {{Political Elections}} in {{Europe}} and {{America}}},
publisher = {{Palgrave Macmillan, London}},
urldate = {2018-07-08},
date = {2013},
pages = {205-228},
author = {Forchtner, Bernhard and Krzyżanowski, Michał and Wodak, Ruth},
file = {/Users/josef/Zotero/storage/NFM98489/9781137273321_10.html},
doi = {10.1057/9781137273321_10}
}
@incollection{bartlett_populism_2014,
langid = {english},
location = {{Stockholm}},
title = {Populism, {{Social Media}} and {{Democratic Strain}}},
isbn = {978-91-87379-22-2},
booktitle = {European Populism and Winning the Immigration Debate},
publisher = {{Fores}},
date = {2014},
pages = {99 - 111},
author = {Bartlett, Jamie},
note = {OCLC: 941347883}
}
@article{freeden_is_1998,
langid = {english},
title = {Is {{Nationalism}} a {{Distinct Ideology}}? , {{Is Nationalism}} a {{Distinct Ideology}}?},
volume = {46},
issn = {0032-3217},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00165},
doi = {10.1111/1467-9248.00165},
shorttitle = {Is {{Nationalism}} a {{Distinct Ideology}}?},
abstract = {Whether or not nationalism is an ideology is a question that can be illuminated by a study of its conceptual structure. Core and adjacent concepts of nationalism are examined within the context of liberal, conservative and fascist ideologies, contexts that respectively encourage particular ideational paths within nationalist argument, while discouraging others. Employing a morphological analysis of ideological configurations, it is argued that various nationalisms may appear as distinct thin-centred ideologies, but are more readily understood as embellishments of, and sustainers of, the features of their host ideologies., Whether or not nationalism is an ideology is a question that can be illuminated by a study of its conceptual structure. Core and adjacent concepts of nationalism are examined within the context of liberal, conservative and fascist ideologies, contexts that respectively encourage particular ideational paths within nationalist argument, while discouraging others. Employing a morphological analysis of ideological configurations, it is argued that various nationalisms may appear as distinct thin-centred ideologies, but are more readily understood as embellishments of, and sustainers of, the features of their host ideologies.},
number = {4},
journaltitle = {Political Studies},
shortjournal = {Political Studies},
urldate = {2018-07-08},
date = {1998-09-01},
pages = {748-765},
author = {Freeden, Michael}
}
@article{jagers_populism_2007,
langid = {english},
title = {Populism as Political Communication Style: {{An}} Empirical Study of Political Parties' Discourse in {{Belgium}}},
volume = {46},
issn = {1475-6765},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x},
doi = {10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x},
shorttitle = {Populism as Political Communication Style},
abstract = {Abstract. The scientific debate about populism has been revitalised by the recent rise of extreme-right parties in Western Europe. Within the broad discussion about populism and its relationship with extreme-right, this article is confined to three topics: a conceptual, an epistemological and an empirical issue. First, taking a clear position in the ongoing definition struggle, populism is defined primarily as a specific political communication style. Populism is conceived of as a political style essentially displaying proximity of the people, while at the same time taking an anti-establishment stance and stressing the (ideal) homogeneity of the people by excluding specific population segments. Second, it is pointed out that defining populism as a style enables one to turn it into a useful concept that has too often remained vague and blurred. Third, drawing on an operational definition of populism, a comparative discourse analysis of the political party broadcasts of the Belgian parties is carried out. The quantitative analysis leads to a clear conclusion. In terms of the degree and the kinds of populism embraced by the six political parties under scrutiny, the extreme-right party Vlaams Blok behaves very differently from the other Belgian parties. Its messages are a copybook example of populism.},
number = {3},
journaltitle = {European Journal of Political Research},
urldate = {2018-07-08},
date = {2007},
pages = {319-345},
author = {Jagers, Jan and Walgrave, Stefaan},
file = {/Users/josef/Zotero/storage/RHFRUHTW/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.html}
}
@article{kriesi_populism_2015,
langid = {english},
title = {Populism : Concepts and Conditions for Its Rise in {{Europe}}},
volume = {16},
issn = {1594-6061},
url = {http://cadmus.eui.eu//handle/1814/46268},
doi = {10.3270/80551},
shorttitle = {Populism},
abstract = {At a time when leading European politicians warn against «populist excesses » (the French President François Hollande), against the «winds of populism» currently threatening Europe (EU-President Herman van Rompuy) or appeal to the electorates to avoid «a return to populism» (the technocratic Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti), the discussion of populism has become a hot topic in social sciences. In the present paper I would like to discuss the concept of populism, and some of the possible conditions for its recent rise in Europe. I introduce two versions of the concept, which are, as I see it, related to each other, but which are not necessarily shared by different authors and which belong to different traditions in the literature. My discussion of the conditions for the rise of populism distinguishes between its immediate causes and two sets of facilitating conditions – each of them closely related to one of the two version of the concept. My argument builds on and refines some of my recent contributions to the same topic (see Kriesi and Pappas, 2015b; Kriesi, 2014).},
journaltitle = {Comunicazione politica},
urldate = {2018-07-08},
date = {2015},
pages = {175-194},
author = {Kriesi, Hanspeter},
file = {/Users/josef/Zotero/storage/34M4NNMS/Kriesi - 2015 - Populism concepts and conditions for its rise in.pdf;/Users/josef/Zotero/storage/8N565P8B/46268.html}
}
@inproceedings{song_topic_2009,
location = {{New York, NY, USA}},
title = {Topic and {{Keyword Re}}-Ranking for {{LDA}}-Based {{Topic Modeling}}},
isbn = {978-1-60558-512-3},
url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1645953.1646223},
doi = {10.1145/1645953.1646223},
abstract = {Topic-based text summaries promise to help average users quickly understand a text collection and derive insights. Recent research has shown that the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model is one of the most effective approaches to topic analysis. However, the LDA-based results may not be ideal for human understanding and consumption. In this paper, we present several topic and keyword re-ranking approaches that can help users better understand and consume the LDA-derived topics in their text analysis. Our methods process the LDA output based on a set of criteria that model a user's information needs. Our evaluation demonstrates the usefulness of the methods in summarizing several large-scale, real world data sets.},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 18th {{ACM Conference}} on {{Information}} and {{Knowledge Management}}},
series = {CIKM '09},
publisher = {{ACM}},
urldate = {2018-07-31},
date = {2009},
pages = {1757--1760},
keywords = {topic and keyword re-ranking,topic model},
author = {Song, Yangqiu and Pan, Shimei and Liu, Shixia and Zhou, Michelle X. and Qian, Weihong}
}