You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, i am trying to implement a controller for multizone_residential_hydronic and am I am unsure if it is supposed to be so slow as other testcase seem to run faster. Also running it with the local and web-based version (code below) will take about 5 minutes to initialize the scenario. Furthermore, sometimes it prints an error shown after the code.
# run TESTCASE=multizone_residential_hydronic docker-compose upimportrequestsurl='http://127.0.0.1:5000'scenario_return=requests.put('{0}/scenario'.format(url),
json={'time_period':'peak_heat_day',
'electricity_price':'constant'}).json()['payload']
Additionally, the following error is displayed (sadly I am not able to reproduce the error - I think you have to terminate one call and start again). Here, I first set the scenario, received the error, then it took about 5 minutes to finish.
ecreating project1-boptest-060_boptest_1 ... doneAttaching to project1-boptest-060_boptest_1boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 05:37:56 AM UTC root INFO Control step set successfully.boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 05:37:56 AM UTC root INFO Test simulation initialized successfully to 0.0s with warmup period of 0.0s.boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 05:37:56 AM UTC root INFO Test case scenario was set successfully.boptest_1 | Simulation interval : 0.0 - 0.0 seconds.boptest_1 | Elapsed simulation time: 0.01302071700047236 seconds.boptest_1 | * Serving Flask app 'restapi'boptest_1 | * Debug mode: offboptest_1 | 10/29/2024 05:37:56 AM UTC werkzeug INFO WARNING: This is a development server. Do not use it in a production deployment. Use a production WSGI server instead.boptest_1 | * Running on all addresses (0.0.0.0)boptest_1 | * Running on http://127.0.0.1:5000boptest_1 | * Running on http://172.19.0.2:5000boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 05:37:56 AM UTC werkzeug INFO Press CTRL+C to quitboptest_1 | 10/29/2024 05:43:42 AM UTC root ERROR Failed to initialize test simulation: Traceback (most recent call last):boptest_1 | File "/home/user/testcase.py", line 170, in __simulationboptest_1 | res = self.fmu.simulate(start_time=start_time,boptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 7573, in pyfmi.fmi.FMUModelCS2.simulateboptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 378, in pyfmi.fmi.ModelBase._exec_simulate_algorithmboptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 374, in pyfmi.fmi.ModelBase._exec_simulate_algorithmboptest_1 | File "/home/user/miniconda/envs/pyfmi3/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyfmi/fmi_algorithm_drivers.py", line 1150, in solveboptest_1 | result_handler.integration_point()boptest_1 | File "/home/user/miniconda/envs/pyfmi3/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyfmi/common/io.py", line 2655, in integration_pointboptest_1 | self._make_consistent()boptest_1 | File "/home/user/miniconda/envs/pyfmi3/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyfmi/common/io.py", line 2670, in _make_consistentboptest_1 | t = np.array([float(self.model.time)])boptest_1 | TypeError: float() argument must be a string or a real number, not 'NoneType'boptest_1 | .boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 05:43:42 AM UTC root ERROR Failed to initialize test simulation: Traceback (most recent call last):boptest_1 | File "/home/user/testcase.py", line 170, in __simulationboptest_1 | res = self.fmu.simulate(start_time=start_time,boptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 7573, in pyfmi.fmi.FMUModelCS2.simulateboptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 378, in pyfmi.fmi.ModelBase._exec_simulate_algorithmboptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 374, in pyfmi.fmi.ModelBase._exec_simulate_algorithmboptest_1 | File "/home/user/miniconda/envs/pyfmi3/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyfmi/fmi_algorithm_drivers.py", line 1150, in solveboptest_1 | result_handler.integration_point()boptest_1 | File "/home/user/miniconda/envs/pyfmi3/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyfmi/common/io.py", line 2655, in integration_pointboptest_1 | self._make_consistent()boptest_1 | File "/home/user/miniconda/envs/pyfmi3/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyfmi/common/io.py", line 2670, in _make_consistentboptest_1 | t = np.array([float(self.model.time)])boptest_1 | TypeError: float() argument must be a string or a real number, not 'NoneType'boptest_1 | .boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 05:43:42 AM UTC werkzeug INFO 172.19.0.1 - - [29/Oct/2024 05:43:42] "PUT /scenario HTTP/1.1" 500 -boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 05:48:37 AM UTC root INFO Test simulation initialized successfully to 2592000.0s with warmup period of 604800.0s.boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 05:48:37 AM UTC root INFO Test case scenario was set successfully.boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 05:48:37 AM UTC werkzeug INFO 172.19.0.1 - - [29/Oct/2024 05:48:37] "PUT /scenario HTTP/1.1" 200 -
Furthermore, I managed created a segmentation fault by trying to set the scenario while one client is already waiting for the response (also if i cancel one call and then try to set it again). Here the output:
boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 06:04:02 AM UTC root WARNING The simulation start time (1987200.000000) and the current time in the model (2155710.000000) is different. Is the simulation start time correctly set?boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 06:04:02 AM UTC root ERROR Failed to initialize test simulation: Traceback (most recent call last):boptest_1 | File "/home/user/testcase.py", line 170, in __simulationboptest_1 | res = self.fmu.simulate(start_time=start_time,boptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 7573, in pyfmi.fmi.FMUModelCS2.simulateboptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 378, in pyfmi.fmi.ModelBase._exec_simulate_algorithmboptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 374, in pyfmi.fmi.ModelBase._exec_simulate_algorithmboptest_1 | File "/home/user/miniconda/envs/pyfmi3/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyfmi/fmi_algorithm_drivers.py", line 1124, in solveboptest_1 | raise fmi.FMUException("The simulation failed. See the log for more information. Return flag %d."%status)boptest_1 | pyfmi.fmi.FMUException: The simulation failed. See the log for more information. Return flag 3.boptest_1 | .boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 06:04:02 AM UTC root ERROR Failed to initialize test simulation: Traceback (most recent call last):boptest_1 | File "/home/user/testcase.py", line 170, in __simulationboptest_1 | res = self.fmu.simulate(start_time=start_time,boptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 7573, in pyfmi.fmi.FMUModelCS2.simulateboptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 378, in pyfmi.fmi.ModelBase._exec_simulate_algorithmboptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 374, in pyfmi.fmi.ModelBase._exec_simulate_algorithmboptest_1 | File "/home/user/miniconda/envs/pyfmi3/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pyfmi/fmi_algorithm_drivers.py", line 1124, in solveboptest_1 | raise fmi.FMUException("The simulation failed. See the log for more information. Return flag %d."%status)boptest_1 | pyfmi.fmi.FMUException: The simulation failed. See the log for more information. Return flag 3.boptest_1 | .boptest_1 | 10/29/2024 06:04:02 AM UTC werkzeug INFO 172.19.0.1 - - [29/Oct/2024 06:04:02] "PUT /scenario HTTP/1.1" 500 -boptest_1 | Traceback (most recent call last):boptest_1 | File "src/pyfmi/fmi.pyx", line 704, in pyfmi.fmi.ModelBase._loggerboptest_1 | Segmentation fault (core dumped)project1-boptest-060_boptest_1 exited with code 139
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey @Rapi1234, thanks for reporting. Yes the multizone_residential_hydronic test case runs slower than other test cases in general. When initializing a scenario time period, BOPTEST runs the model for one week leading up to the start time of the scenario. Unfortunately, for the multizone_residential_hydronic, this indeed seems to take about 5 minutes to run. We would like to look at ways to speed up simulation of this model, but it will take some time, as the speed is related to a few things: the mathematical model implementation, embedded control logic implementation, the size of the model, the FMU compilation tool, and the FMU simulation tool and method.
Regarding your errors, they may be related to trying to send commands to the Docker container while the initialization is still running, though I haven't tested this too much to understand more.
Hi, i am trying to implement a controller for multizone_residential_hydronic and am I am unsure if it is supposed to be so slow as other testcase seem to run faster. Also running it with the local and web-based version (code below) will take about 5 minutes to initialize the scenario. Furthermore, sometimes it prints an error shown after the code.
Additionally, the following error is displayed (sadly I am not able to reproduce the error - I think you have to terminate one call and start again). Here, I first set the scenario, received the error, then it took about 5 minutes to finish.
Furthermore, I managed created a segmentation fault by trying to set the scenario while one client is already waiting for the response (also if i cancel one call and then try to set it again). Here the output:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: