You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 24, 2024. It is now read-only.
Right now, there are ambiguities about the best way to fit a ZK verifier into Sovereign light clients. This issue is about figuring out how to smoothly add that verifier into the CW contract of rollup clients. The goal? To get a single, slick WASM light client that can keep tabs on both the DA layer and rollup states within a Sovereign-driven rollup.
Here is what we're pondering
Is the proof data structure discussed in Determine aggregated proof data structure #53 good enough for verification? Or do we need to toss in something extra, like a structured Proof Specification like what we have as ProofSpecs for Tendermint light clients?
Do we need to set up a way for the ZK proof verifier to call up some guest code or programs when it's time to check that SNARK proof?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Farhad-Shabani
changed the title
Investigate best way to incorporate SNARK verifier within Sovereign light clients
Determine how to integrate ZK Verifier into Sovereign Light Clients
Jan 11, 2024
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Background
Right now, there are ambiguities about the best way to fit a ZK verifier into Sovereign light clients. This issue is about figuring out how to smoothly add that verifier into the CW contract of rollup clients. The goal? To get a single, slick WASM light client that can keep tabs on both the DA layer and rollup states within a Sovereign-driven rollup.
Here is what we're pondering
Is the proof data structure discussed in Determine aggregated proof data structure #53 good enough for verification? Or do we need to toss in something extra, like a structured Proof Specification like what we have as
ProofSpecs
for Tendermint light clients?Do we need to set up a way for the ZK proof verifier to call up some guest code or programs when it's time to check that SNARK proof?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: