Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow clients to be run unmodified from more locations #7

Open
smithdh opened this issue Jun 11, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

allow clients to be run unmodified from more locations #7

smithdh opened this issue Jun 11, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@smithdh
Copy link

smithdh commented Jun 11, 2014

Hello,

Installing the v3 clients package in an alternate location can not work at the moment without modifying the client scripts (i.e. voms-proxy-destroy, voms-proxy-info or voms-proxy-init). The alternate location might be a relocated install and dependencies might also be installed in various locations (e.g. with varying bases).

Please could the client scripts be enhanced so they can run without modifications in situations like those. It is imaged that this would need the user to have a suitable voms client specific environment variable set; e.g. the paths of required jar files. (A list of jar files rather than their containing directories may save the time of scanning the directories, which is what the client script currently does for some jar files).

Thanks,
David

@andreaceccanti
Copy link
Contributor

Hi David,

we plan the ship the clients as a single jar in the future and adapt the script accordingly, so that would
likely solve the relocation issues.

Thanks
Andrea

@smithdh
Copy link
Author

smithdh commented Jun 12, 2014

Hi Andrea,

Thanks for the information. I suppose packages like jakarta-commons-io, bouncycastle146 and bouncycastle146-mail will still be needed, but won't be shipped in the single jar. In that case we still need to be able to have the voms-proxy-* scripts be able to pass on the locations to java for those too.

Yours,
David

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants