You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I hope this repo is the right one to ask this question.
My research based on the XRechnung 3.0.2 specification document, your gitlab repo's discussion and further sources didn't get me anywhere.
So in detail: For BT-95, BT-102, BT-151, BT-118 only the codes S, Z, E, AE, K, G, O, L and M of the code list UNTDID 5305 are valid, according to your specification and validators.
However, in Germany, there exist two VAT rates 19% (Standard Rate, thus Code S) and 7% (Lower Rate).
The intuitive fit for the 7% percent reduced tax rate would be Code AA which is specified as "Lower Rate" and described as "Tax rate is lower than standard rate" in the UNTDID 5305 code list.
Why is it that code S needs to be used for both the 7% tax rate as well as the 19% tax rate?
Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I hope this repo is the right one to ask this question.
My research based on the XRechnung 3.0.2 specification document, your gitlab repo's discussion and further sources didn't get me anywhere.
So in detail: For BT-95, BT-102, BT-151, BT-118 only the codes
S
,Z
,E
,AE
,K
,G
,O
,L
andM
of the code list UNTDID 5305 are valid, according to your specification and validators.However, in Germany, there exist two VAT rates 19% (Standard Rate, thus Code
S
) and 7% (Lower Rate).The intuitive fit for the 7% percent reduced tax rate would be Code
AA
which is specified as "Lower Rate" and described as "Tax rate is lower than standard rate" in the UNTDID 5305 code list.Why is it that code
S
needs to be used for both the 7% tax rate as well as the 19% tax rate?Thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: