You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I don't know if this is expected. I have discovered that this custom card interferes with others.
I detected that the multiple-entity-row card was having a bad behavior. You can get a complete description of the issue and the tests here: benct/lovelace-multiple-entity-row#138
Finally, I discovered that the culprit was lovelace-canary. Removing it the multiple-entity-row card worked again as expected.
I don't know if this is a known limitation of the card or a bug. I used it basically as replacement of stack-in-card but if this is not a bug, I think I will need to return to it or to something similar and I like the simplicity of yours.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks, this is actually expected, if two cards are handling the secondary_info option, then Canary will override its expansion. It is impossible to add exclusions for every plugin that handles its own secondary info templating, which is why the disable_canary option exists, see Disabling-Extensions.
I should be able to add an exclusion for multiple-entity-row, for now adding disable_canary: secondary_info to the configs will solve this issue.
First of all, thanks for your great card.
I don't know if this is expected. I have discovered that this custom card interferes with others.
I detected that the
multiple-entity-row
card was having a bad behavior. You can get a complete description of the issue and the tests here: benct/lovelace-multiple-entity-row#138Finally, I discovered that the culprit was
lovelace-canary
. Removing it themultiple-entity-row
card worked again as expected.I don't know if this is a known limitation of the card or a bug. I used it basically as replacement of
stack-in-card
but if this is not a bug, I think I will need to return to it or to something similar and I like the simplicity of yours.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: