Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
Yes, in the new version (coming out in a couple of days), this is implemented. Every field that has |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
formatter is currently only in a comment: future idea or next milestone? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I believe @rodja suggested separating issues with components from the core functionality and stability. I think we should focus on the latter. AgGrid has so many features, it would be a big task to accommodate all of them |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@elimintz did that ever get incorporated in a release (that every field that has "formatter" in its name is evaluated as javascript)? I am currently trying to use the valueFormatter field but given that field is nested in grid options it is not working through the grid.evaluate call. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Referring to Tutorial-Grids-FieldEvaluation, this currently only handles fields at the top level of the options dictionary.
An improvement would be to handle nested fields that need to be JavaScript-evaluated.
An example would be formatting functions defined in columnTypes and/or columnDefs.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions