Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Selection of Feature Fusion Methods #4

Open
Anonymity-Aum opened this issue Jul 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Selection of Feature Fusion Methods #4

Anonymity-Aum opened this issue Jul 13, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Anonymity-Aum
Copy link

  1. Why did you choose the addition method for feature fusion instead of concatenation? Is there a specific reason behind this choice, or is it based on experimental results that show the addition method performs better?

  2. I noticed in the code that the method "Use Bidirectional Attention Fusion" is mentioned, but I couldn't find the code for FuseBiAttn. Could you please provide more information on this?

Thank you for your time and assistance.

@junseok520
Copy link
Collaborator

  1. We conducted experiments on various feature fusion methods, among which the main ones were ADDITION and CONCATENATION, and adopted ADDITION as the final model because it had the best sign language recognition performance in terms of WER.

  2. The various feature fusion methods mentioned above include attention-based methods. In our initial experiments, the ATTENTION-based fusion was similar in performance to the ADDITION method, but it required excessive computational cost and GPU memory, so we did not consider it further. Therefore, the code was removed from the released repo. However, we inform you that our implementation was similar to the Nonlocal class (nonlocal_helper.py) in the slowfast repo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants