Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request to Update GGMN Data for France #756

Open
EliVolsch opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 18 comments
Open

Request to Update GGMN Data for France #756

EliVolsch opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 18 comments
Assignees
Labels
Priority: High Address issue ASAP Size: 2 Give me 2 hours and I will have it for you Support Portal Ticket logged via Kartoza support portal

Comments

@EliVolsch
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear Kartoza,

I hope this email finds you well.
We have received feedback from our colleagues in France regarding the data from their ADES platform that is integrated into the GGMN through our API. It appears that some data on their platform has been corrected but these updates are not yet reflected on the GGMN.
To address this, could you please remove the current data for France from the GGMN and re-upload it so the updated data can be reflected correctly?
I have attached a screenshot of their email where they have found inconsistencies.
Thank you for your assistance, and please let me know if you need any additional information.

Screenshot
Best regards,
Elie

@EliVolsch EliVolsch added Priority: High Address issue ASAP Support Portal Ticket logged via Kartoza support portal labels Jan 13, 2025
@meomancer
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @clau1313
Is it for all of well under france? Or just the well that is coming from the API?

@Elie114
Copy link
Collaborator

Elie114 commented Jan 13, 2025

Hi Irwan,

We initially thought that all the wells from France were coming from the API.
If that’s not the case, could you please let us know which ones aren’t?

@meomancer meomancer moved this from To do to This Sprint in IGRAC GGIS Jan 17, 2025
@meomancer meomancer moved this from This Sprint to In progress in IGRAC GGIS Jan 17, 2025
@meomancer
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @clau1313 @Elie114
I have rerun the fetching data for 03862X0057/PZ
https://ggis.un-igrac.org/groundwater/record/84677/

But it is still showing pattern like before

Image

I checked their API, the measurements are still the same with before
https://hubeau.eaufrance.fr/api/v1/niveaux_nappes/chroniques?fields=date_mesure,profondeur_nappe&code_bss=03862X0057/PZ&sort=asc&page=1&size=500

Could you ask them if we use correct API?

@meomancer meomancer moved this from In progress to Blocked or More Information in IGRAC GGIS Jan 17, 2025
@Elie114
Copy link
Collaborator

Elie114 commented Jan 17, 2025

Hi Irwan,

We have received the following answer: Your are looking at « profondeur » and you should look at “water depth”. Here the origin of the problem. If it is no clear for you I will put you in contact with HUBEAU administrator

and indeed on their platform if you choose 'Cote NGF' instead of 'profondeur' we will have their curve.
Can you adjust it please?

Image

@meomancer
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @Elie114
Where is above website? Can you share the link?

@meomancer
Copy link
Collaborator

@meomancer meomancer moved this from Blocked or More Information to In progress in IGRAC GGIS Jan 17, 2025
@meomancer meomancer added the Size: 2 Give me 2 hours and I will have it for you label Jan 17, 2025
@meomancer
Copy link
Collaborator

I think i found it @Elie114
It is using niveau_nappe_eau

I rerun it from my side
Image

@Elie114
Copy link
Collaborator

Elie114 commented Jan 17, 2025

@Elie114
Copy link
Collaborator

Elie114 commented Jan 17, 2025

let me know when it it updated please

@meomancer meomancer moved this from In progress to In Review in IGRAC GGIS Jan 17, 2025
@meomancer
Copy link
Collaborator

meomancer commented Jan 17, 2025

Hi @Elie114 I think now it is correct

https://ggis.un-igrac.org/groundwater/record/84677/

I will run the other wells, hopefully it will be done over the weekend

@meomancer meomancer moved this from In Review to In progress in IGRAC GGIS Jan 20, 2025
@meomancer meomancer moved this from In progress to In Review in IGRAC GGIS Jan 20, 2025
@Elie114
Copy link
Collaborator

Elie114 commented Jan 20, 2025

Dear Irwan,
can you let me know when the run is done; so I can reach out to our colleagues in BRGM (France).

@meomancer
Copy link
Collaborator

meomancer commented Jan 20, 2025

Hi @Elie114

It is still processing

The progress = 1253/15167
The slowness coming from:

  1. Deleting process
  2. Fetching process
  3. Saving process

And also there was process for other harvesters (for every Saturday), making our resource splitting between harvesters

@Elie114
Copy link
Collaborator

Elie114 commented Jan 20, 2025

That's no problem! You can simply leave a comment here when it is done.

@Elie114
Copy link
Collaborator

Elie114 commented Jan 23, 2025

Can i have an update here please

@meomancer
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @Elie114 It is still 2.482/15.167

I think i will update the harvester to be able to do it in parallel, but i will release it on next Thursday as i will be on leave until wednesday
Just to prevent the site not down when i'm on leave

@meomancer meomancer moved this from In Review to In progress in IGRAC GGIS Jan 24, 2025
@meomancer meomancer moved this from In progress to This Sprint in IGRAC GGIS Jan 24, 2025
@meomancer meomancer moved this from This Sprint to In progress in IGRAC GGIS Jan 24, 2025
@meomancer meomancer moved this from In progress to In Review in IGRAC GGIS Jan 30, 2025
@Elie114
Copy link
Collaborator

Elie114 commented Jan 30, 2025

update please on this one!

@meomancer meomancer moved this from In Review to In progress in IGRAC GGIS Jan 31, 2025
@meomancer
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @Elie114
It is 3309/15202
I have deployed the harvester to run in 3 sessions, hopefully it can be faster

@Elie114
Copy link
Collaborator

Elie114 commented Jan 31, 2025

Great Thank you! The country is waiting for our reply

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority: High Address issue ASAP Size: 2 Give me 2 hours and I will have it for you Support Portal Ticket logged via Kartoza support portal
Projects
Status: In progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants