Issue with Adding Specific Wells to GGMN (New Zealand Case)

[EliVolsch]

Hi,
I have attached a screenshot for a report that I got when uploading data to the GGMN. as you can see the problem is 'get() returned more than one Well -- it returned 2!'
However, the red rows highlighted in red have ID: 5005 5006 5007, and 5023; and there is no duplicates in the column.
Can you fix this so these 4 wells are also added?
Thank you

[meomancer]

Hi @clau1313 @Elie114
The problem is because There is actually 2 wells with ID 5005
https://ggis.un-igrac.org/groundwater/record/410267/ : WWD32
https://ggis.un-igrac.org/groundwater/record/82333/ : Well..5005 Waipukurau Depot

We can check by ID and name

But the problem will be on the monitoring data, which is currently we check the data based on just the ID column

What do you suggest?
Should we:

• Remove one of it?
• Also add name on the monitoring data excel to prevent this?

[clau1313]

hi @meomancer, thanks. It would be good to add the name on the monitoring data excel to prevent this issue.

But then, what happens if a well has only ID but no name?

[meomancer]

Hi @clau1313
The name is just used for checking the well if it returns 2 or more well
If it return more well, it will check also the name

If it is provide no name, if the ID also in multiple wells, it still error

[clau1313]

Hi @meomancer, thanks for the clarification. Then let's use the name for cheking the wells if the system returns 2 or more wells with only ID.

In the case that the ID and name are the same, can the system also check the coordinates? (this scenario is unlikely, but just in case?)

[meomancer]

Ok @clau1313
I think instead adding the name, we can put latitude and longitude on the files

[Elie114]

Hi @meomancer
Let's go ahead and stick with the ID and Name for now as @clau1313 mentioned.