You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Supporting the appropriate type-classes from lens like Seq does could make transitioning from Seq to Vector as simple as just changing the used type constructor for code using lens.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That's a nice idea, but I don't want to add too many dependencies (and lens has a lot). Note that I already have instances for indexed-traversable (which is reexported by lens) and the other instances should be easy to implement.
I wouldn't be opposed to an rrb-vector-lens package which adds orphan instances for the lens type classes, or an optional dependency on lens (but I'm not sure how/if that works).
Supporting the appropriate type-classes from
lens
likeSeq
does could make transitioning fromSeq
toVector
as simple as just changing the used type constructor for code usinglens
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: