Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

consider replacing FRBR discussion with PROV-O or IFLA LRM #90

Open
kshawkin opened this issue Sep 23, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

consider replacing FRBR discussion with PROV-O or IFLA LRM #90

kshawkin opened this issue Sep 23, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@kshawkin
Copy link
Owner

kshawkin commented Sep 23, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Replace with PROV-O (see discussion at https://listserv.brown.edu/archives/cgi-bin/wa?A2=TEI-L;102b9d22.1809 ) or IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM) (see https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11412 ). LRM appears to have kept the four "group 1" entities", so this option would be straightforward.
@kshawkin kshawkin changed the title consider replacing FRBR discussion with PROV-O? consider replacing FRBR discussion with PROV-O or IFLA LRM Nov 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kshawkin