Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Formalizing code owners #346

Open
evrardjp opened this issue Apr 7, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

Formalizing code owners #346

evrardjp opened this issue Apr 7, 2021 · 7 comments
Labels
keep This won't be closed by the stale bot.

Comments

@evrardjp
Copy link
Collaborator

evrardjp commented Apr 7, 2021

Our team is oriented with ppl in some knowledge in an area, and less in others, so it might be worth formalizing this under the form of codeowners. Codeowners would allow us to ping the right person automatically on code reviews, and make it easier for community members to know what they own or what are the areas that deserve more love.

WDYT?

@dholbach
Copy link
Member

No objections -maybe discuss in the meeting?

@ckotzbauer
Copy link
Member

I also have no objections. Unfortunately I'm again not able to participate to the meeting today. 😞 If it's discussed I'll give feedback afterwards 😉

@evrardjp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We discussed it during the meeting, and we would be okay to try this.

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue was automatically considered stale due to lack of activity. Please update it and/or join our slack channels to promote it, before it automatically closes (in 7 days).

@ckotzbauer ckotzbauer added keep This won't be closed by the stale bot. and removed no-issue-activity labels Sep 11, 2021
@evrardjp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I guess the next steps would be to decide who owns what.... Any volunteers? :)

@ckotzbauer
Copy link
Member

I can do the helm-stuff 😉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
keep This won't be closed by the stale bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants