Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interpretibility of adata.uns['spatial_interaction'] #88

Open
Dillon214 opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Interpretibility of adata.uns['spatial_interaction'] #88

Dillon214 opened this issue Jan 24, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Dillon214
Copy link

Hello Scimap devs,

I have a question regarding scimap results obtained after running sm.pl.spatial_interaction. The results are confusing to me. I see some instances where z scores which should by all accounts be insignificant (such as -0.0, though I am unsure why it is negative) showing low p values. Can you shed some light on why this might occur? I expected high and low z scores to be the most significant, which would make sense for plotting purposes.

Sincerely,
Dillon Brownell

@ajitjohnson
Copy link
Collaborator

ajitjohnson commented Jan 29, 2024

hi @Dillon214 are you referring low p-value as being > 0.05?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants