Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add case study on MOF pore volume sanity check #11

Open
kjappelbaum opened this issue May 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

add case study on MOF pore volume sanity check #11

kjappelbaum opened this issue May 12, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@kjappelbaum
Labels
low-priority

Comments

@kjappelbaum
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@kjappelbaum kjappelbaum self-assigned this May 12, 2024
@kjappelbaum
Copy link
Contributor Author

actually, thinking more about it, it is not really clear how I would really do that.

The most sensible thing might be to check if pore volume and uptake are physically compatible - which will require some database of densities of gases

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@kjappelbaum kjappelbaum

Labels
low-priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kjappelbaum