You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for developing and maintaining AnnotSV—it’s an excellent tool for structural variant annotation. However, I encountered an issue while processing my data.
After running AnnotSV, the resulting .tsv file contains a large number of SVs with the same ID and identical chromosome start and end positions. I’m not sure why this duplication occurs, as I expected each SV to be uniquely identified in the output.
Could you please help clarify why this is happening? I’ve attached the TSV file and the exact command/code I used for reference.
Annotation on the “full” length of the SV. Every SV are reported, even those not covering a gene. This type
of annotation gives an estimate of the SV itself.
Annotation of the SV “split” by gene. This type of annotation gives an opportunity to focus on each gene
overlapped by the SV. Thus, when a SV spans over several genes, the output will contain as many annotations lines as genes covered. This latter annotation is extremely powerful to shorten the identification of mutation implicated in a specific gene.
Hi, @lgmgeo
Thank you for developing and maintaining AnnotSV—it’s an excellent tool for structural variant annotation. However, I encountered an issue while processing my data.
After running AnnotSV, the resulting .tsv file contains a large number of SVs with the same ID and identical chromosome start and end positions. I’m not sure why this duplication occurs, as I expected each SV to be uniquely identified in the output.
Could you please help clarify why this is happening? I’ve attached the TSV file and the exact command/code I used for reference.
BA013_P_1.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: