You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now we can pass multiple columns to marbl%set_surface_forcing(), but marbl%set_interior_forcing has to be called one column at a time. It would likely be a huge performance gain if we could pass in multiple columns.
This would supercede #66, but that ticket raises a good point about how this assumption that num_elements_interior_forcing is assumed to be 1 at some points in the code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A lot of the MARBL code has a placeholder dimension for the column id -- currently this is the first dimension in the array, but is that where we want it? As written, we might be getting un-necessary memory copies.
Right now we can pass multiple columns to
marbl%set_surface_forcing()
, butmarbl%set_interior_forcing
has to be called one column at a time. It would likely be a huge performance gain if we could pass in multiple columns.This would supercede #66, but that ticket raises a good point about how this assumption that
num_elements_interior_forcing
is assumed to be 1 at some points in the code.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: