We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If you have an expression which can be used to construct multiple types, the generated code will not populate all of them correctly. For example, take
type V0 = Vec<u8>; type V1 = Vec<u16>;
The mycroft program
foo(V0) bar(V1) ?get_foo(~(Vec::new())) ?get_bar(~(Vec::new()))
will generate incorrect code.
One possibility for fixing this is to add types to all constant names.
For now, the workaround is to give a specialized name to the function in the surrounding code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
If you have an expression which can be used to construct multiple types, the generated code will not populate all of them correctly. For example, take
The mycroft program
will generate incorrect code.
One possibility for fixing this is to add types to all constant names.
For now, the workaround is to give a specialized name to the function in the surrounding code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: