Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The script to copy information from duplicate bugs to the bugs they have been duplicated to should not revert signature changes #1158

Open
amccreight opened this issue Sep 17, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@amccreight
Copy link

Jens removed a signature, because it is invalid (I'll file a separate issue about that): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1435343#c90

Then right after, bugbug added the same signature right back. It would be better if it didn't just flip the signatures right back after somebody changed them.

@marco-c marco-c transferred this issue from mozilla/bugbug Sep 17, 2021
@marco-c marco-c changed the title bugbug reverts signature changes Don't revert signature changes Sep 17, 2021
@marco-c
Copy link
Contributor

marco-c commented Sep 17, 2021

Moved to the autonag repository as the problem is not in bugbug.

@marco-c marco-c changed the title Don't revert signature changes The script to copy information from duplicate bugs to the bugs they have been duplicated to should not revert signature changes Sep 17, 2021
@marco-c
Copy link
Contributor

marco-c commented Sep 17, 2021

I'm unsure whether we should actually do this, or if we should keep the same information across bugs in the same "duplicate group".

@suhaibmujahid
Copy link
Member

@marco-c should we do this as part of #1760? If we merge copy_duplicate_info into duplicate_copy_metadata, this will be automatically solved.

@marco-c
Copy link
Contributor

marco-c commented Nov 18, 2022

Sounds good!

@marco-c
Copy link
Contributor

marco-c commented Nov 18, 2022

This is very rare though, so let's only do it if it's super quick.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants