Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parallel tests for structural plasticity and disconnect #533

Open
heplesser opened this issue Oct 31, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Parallel tests for structural plasticity and disconnect #533

heplesser opened this issue Oct 31, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
I: No breaking change Previously written code will work as before, no one should note anything changing (aside the fix) S: Normal Handle this with default priority stale Automatic marker for inactivity, please have another look here T: Maintenance Work to keep up the quality of the code and documentation.

Comments

@heplesser
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, there are no tests for structural plasticity running in parallel, neither using MPI, nor threads, or a combination of both. These tests need to be added. They should also cover plain Disconnect without use of structural plasticity.

See also #290.

@sdiazpier Could you work on this?

@heplesser heplesser changed the title Parallell tests for structural plasticity and disconnect Parallel tests for structural plasticity and disconnect Nov 2, 2016
@heplesser heplesser added ZC: Kernel DO NOT USE THIS LABEL I: No breaking change Previously written code will work as before, no one should note anything changing (aside the fix) ZP: Pending DO NOT USE THIS LABEL S: Normal Handle this with default priority T: Maintenance Work to keep up the quality of the code and documentation. labels Nov 17, 2016
@sdiazpier
Copy link
Contributor

I have a simple test ready working with MPI. I can submit this rather soon.

@heplesser
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sdiazpier Ping!

@heplesser heplesser removed ZC: Kernel DO NOT USE THIS LABEL ZP: Pending DO NOT USE THIS LABEL labels Jun 30, 2021
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2021

Issue automatically marked stale!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Automatic marker for inactivity, please have another look here label Sep 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
I: No breaking change Previously written code will work as before, no one should note anything changing (aside the fix) S: Normal Handle this with default priority stale Automatic marker for inactivity, please have another look here T: Maintenance Work to keep up the quality of the code and documentation.
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants