Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tests of statistical properties for randomized generators #773

Open
hakonsbm opened this issue Jun 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Add tests of statistical properties for randomized generators #773

hakonsbm opened this issue Jun 30, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
I: No breaking change Previously written code will work as before, no one should note anything changing (aside the fix) S: Normal Handle this with default priority stale Automatic marker for inactivity, please have another look here T: Maintenance Work to keep up the quality of the code and documentation.

Comments

@hakonsbm
Copy link
Contributor

We currently have no tests of the statistical properties of spike trains generated by randomized generators. That should be fixed.

This issue is also described in #348, but it is better to have this as a separate issue.

@hakonsbm hakonsbm changed the title Add tests for randomized generators Add tests of statistical properties for randomized generators Jun 30, 2017
@terhorstd terhorstd added ZC: Infrastructure DO NOT USE THIS LABEL I: No breaking change Previously written code will work as before, no one should note anything changing (aside the fix) ZP: Pending DO NOT USE THIS LABEL S: Normal Handle this with default priority T: Maintenance Work to keep up the quality of the code and documentation. labels Jul 24, 2017
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2021

Issue automatically marked stale!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Automatic marker for inactivity, please have another look here label Sep 3, 2021
@stinebuu stinebuu removed ZC: Infrastructure DO NOT USE THIS LABEL ZP: Pending DO NOT USE THIS LABEL labels Nov 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
I: No breaking change Previously written code will work as before, no one should note anything changing (aside the fix) S: Normal Handle this with default priority stale Automatic marker for inactivity, please have another look here T: Maintenance Work to keep up the quality of the code and documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants