New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Highlighted LTL counterexample wrong #484

Open

rensink opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 0 comments

Assignees

Labels

bug

Collaborator

rensink commented Apr 3, 2018

In the enclosed rule system, the LTL property G(!get U put) shows a counter-example involving 2 spurious get-transitions

Reported by: rensink

rensink self-assigned this

rensink added bug and removed bugs-replaced labels

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment