Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Flexible parameter treatment when using rules as conditions #739

Open
rensink opened this issue Jul 15, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

Flexible parameter treatment when using rules as conditions #739

rensink opened this issue Jul 15, 2014 · 0 comments
Assignees
@rensink
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rensink
Copy link
Collaborator

rensink commented Jul 15, 2014

In the exploration bound and acceptor, and in model checking, rule names are used as propositions. Right now these must literally match the transition label to be satisfied.

Ideas:

  • Allow parameter-less names even if the rule has parameters
  • Allow underscores as don't care parameters

Reported by: rensink
@rensink rensink self-assigned this Mar 7, 2024
@rensink rensink added enhancement New feature or request and removed feature-request labels Mar 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rensink rensink

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rensink