Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Level tree functionality can be improved #799

Open
rensink opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Level tree functionality can be improved #799

rensink opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rensink
Copy link
Collaborator

rensink commented Aug 2, 2024

The level tree, showing (and allowing to select and include/exclude) quantifier levels in a nested rule, can be improved in several ways.

  • When selecting/excluding a named level, the corresponding quantified edges are not taken into account
  • Dually, a node with such a quantified edge (as above) should remain included if the named level is included
  • Excluding a given level could passively exclude all sublevels
  • In the rule system below, excluding E.1.0 of rule fired incorrectly excludes the RuleOcc node

build-occurrence-graph-stepwise-rs.gps.zip

@rensink rensink added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 2, 2024
rensink added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant