Releases: oncokb/oncokb-annotator
Releases · oncokb/oncokb-annotator
v2.3.3
v2.3.2
Changes
🐛 Bug Fixes
🕵️♀️ Full commit logs
v2.3.1
Changes
👷♀️ Testing, Configuration & Deployment
🕵️♀️ Full commit logs
v2.3.0
Changes
🧬 Features
- Use POST methods for annotation to improve the performance @zhx828 @darasanchez (#87)
🐛 Bug Fixes
🕵️♀️ Full commit logs
v2.2.2
v2.2.1
🧬 Features
- Add examples for atypical alterations @zhx828 (#64)
- Support 3 Letter Code on HGVSP Column @darasanchez (#65)
🧰 Maintenance
🕵️♀️ Full commit logs
v2.2.0
Changes
🧬 Features
- Give option to annotate Gain/Loss CNA events @zhx828 (#58)
- Include Gene in OncoKB and Variant in OncoKB columns @zhx828 (#53)
- Do not make API calls for genes are note curated in OncoKB @zhx828 (#55)
- Allow user uploads SV name format REGEX @zhx828 (#54)
🐛 Bug Fixes
- Give option to not upper case column name when reading file header @zhx828 (#56)
- Shorten the example MAF to include essential columns only @zhx828 (#45)
🧰 Maintenance
- Bump requests from 2.11.1 to 2.20.0 @dependabot (#40)
🕵️♀️ Full commit logs
Turn off unnecessary log from the libraries
Merge pull request #44 from victoria34/turn-off Turn off requests additional log mesaages
Make oncokb-annotator compatible with Python3
v2.1.0 Merge pull request #41 from victoria34/compatible-python3
Support V2 Levels of Evidence
Introducing Simplified OncoKB Levels of Evidence:
- New Level 2, defined as “Standard care biomarker recommended by the NCCN or other expert panels predictive of response to an FDA-approved drug in this indication” (formerly Level 2A).
- Unified Level 3B, defined as “Standard care or investigational biomarker predictive of response to an FDA-approved or investigational drug in another indication” (combination of previous Levels 2B and 3B).
We have implemented these changes for 2 reasons:
- To be consistent with the Joint Consensus Recommendation by AMP, ASCO and CAP and the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT)
- To reflect the clinical data that demonstrates patients with investigational predictive biomarkers for a specific tumor type based on compelling clinical evidence (currently Level 3A) are more likely to experience clinical benefit compared to patients with predictive biomarkers that are considered standard care in a different tumor type (previously Level 2B, now combined into Level 3B).
If you want to annotate your files with previous Levels of Evidence, please git checkout v1
.