Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Output contains null replacesStatements #3

Open
radix0000 opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Output contains null replacesStatements #3

radix0000 opened this issue Sep 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@radix0000
Copy link
Collaborator

A very small number of (3 out of 13.3 million) statements have a null value for the replacesStatement. This is due to complex series of deletions/replacements GLEIF is performing in these cases not being handled correctly. Given that the whole replacesStatement mechanism now being replaced, work on fixing this has been paused until BODS 0.4 implementation, as it may just work within a better system for handling change over time.

@radix0000 radix0000 self-assigned this Sep 16, 2024
@kd-ods
Copy link

kd-ods commented Sep 17, 2024

complex series of deletions/replacements GLEIF is performing in these cases

@kathryn-ods - this is the kind of thing we'll be trying to understand with the help of the GLEIF data team, I suppose.

@kathryn-ods
Copy link

complex series of deletions/replacements GLEIF is performing in these cases

@kathryn-ods - this is the kind of thing we'll be trying to understand with the help of the GLEIF data team, I suppose.

I think in this particular case of it only being 3 records I probably won't raise it as a specific issue but potentially the conversations will give us some context for what is going on?

@radix0000
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yes, when we have time we probably need to work out the exact sequence of "GLEIF events" for each one, and what we think that means. But as I say when we implement BODS 0.4 it may just work, or we can worry about it then if it doesn't.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants