Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature: Be able to use HFID instead of ID in the inventory #85

Open
BeArchiTek opened this issue Jul 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Feature: Be able to use HFID instead of ID in the inventory #85

BeArchiTek opened this issue Jul 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
state/backlog This issue is part of the backlog type/feature New feature or request

Comments

@BeArchiTek
Copy link
Contributor

Infrahub version

v0.15

Feature type

Change to existing Plugin

Proposed functionality

As a user i would like to be able to use the HFID instead of the ID in the inventory

Use case

Be able to use the HFID instead of the ID in the inventory

External dependencies

No response
@BeArchiTek BeArchiTek added the type/feature New feature or request label Jul 19, 2024
@exalate-issue-sync exalate-issue-sync bot changed the title [Feature]: Be able to use HFID instead of ID in the inventory internal: [Feature]: Be able to use HFID instead of ID in the inventory Dec 23, 2024
@lykinsbd lykinsbd changed the title internal: [Feature]: Be able to use HFID instead of ID in the inventory Feature: Be able to use HFID instead of ID in the inventory Dec 23, 2024
@exalate-issue-sync exalate-issue-sync bot added state/need-triage This issue needs to be triaged state/backlog This issue is part of the backlog and removed state/needs-triage state/need-triage This issue needs to be triaged labels Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
state/backlog This issue is part of the backlog type/feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@BeArchiTek