We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
http://documentup.com/perplexes/m2r http://www.rubydoc.info/github/perplexes/m2r/
Document private / public classes in API.
Which tool should we use for documentation: http://warpspire.com/talks/documentation/ ?
The documentation should be considered from 2 points:
m2r
rack
Ruby on Rails
Sinatra
mongrel2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
http://thechangelog.com/post/3032074343/top-ten-reasons-why-i-wont-use-your-open-source-project
Sorry, something went wrong.
http://gnuu.org/2010/05/12/whats-missing-from-tomdoc/ rubyworks/yard-tomdoc#8 rubyworks/yard-tomdoc#7
Documenting first method revealed issues with tomdoc so I am going to stick with YARD and fix that documentation.
YARD
Great documentation is very hard to pull off. To even have good documentation you need to meet three major needs.
from http://calv.info/what-10gen-nailed-with-mongodb/
@pawelpacana I documented almost everything. Could you take a look ? Here are my doubts for the rest of the stuff:
Rack::Handler::Mongrel2
M2R::RackHandler
No branches or pull requests
http://documentup.com/perplexes/m2r
http://www.rubydoc.info/github/perplexes/m2r/
Document private / public classes in API.
Which tool should we use for documentation: http://warpspire.com/talks/documentation/ ?
The documentation should be considered from 2 points:
m2r
to runrack
application. ProbablyRuby on Rails
orSinatra
.mongrel2
that has nothing to do withrack
whatsoever.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: