Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exzerpts not showing if using Page builder like Avada #517

Open
puma13992 opened this issue Jul 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Exzerpts not showing if using Page builder like Avada #517

puma13992 opened this issue Jul 3, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@puma13992
Copy link

Expected behavior

The shortcode with exzerpt=yes or exzerpt=full should be shown an exzerpt of the post(s)

Actual behavior

If we are using our page builder Avada, the exzerpt=yes/full shortcode doesn´t grab an exzerpt from the content, only from the WP exzerpt

Shortcode used and steps to reproduce the behavior

[glossary_exclude][catlist post_type="releasenotes" taxonomies_and="auslieferung:{208-fv24-auslieferung-kw16};releasenote-status:{pal-behoben}"  customfield_compare="produkt,regexp,^(cs.apl.cfg|cs.apl.huj|cs.bur.bug|cs.bur.rec|cs.edi.as4|cs.gpi.sig.common|cs.ins.ein|cs.its.sms|cs.wfe.wfv)$" customfield_display="produkt,modul,wid,beschreibung" exzerpt="full" customfield_display_name="yes" customfield_display_separately="yes" class="nicer-catlist-prozesspakete" no_posts_text="" conditional_title="Alle Produkte zum Prozesspaket AS4-Adapter & aus FV24/KW16 Problem behoben"][/glossary_exclude] 

WP version, LCP plugin version (versions of other software if relevant, e.g. PHP)

(If you want to submit a feature request, delete the sections above and describe the suggested feature.)

@klemens-st
Copy link
Collaborator

klemens-st commented Dec 15, 2024

I don't have an Avada license on hand to test this, but I assume the content is stored in a way that our current implementation is not aware of. If you can figure out whether Avada has its own custom way of providing excerpts programmatically, please report back so we can make it compatible with LCP.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants