You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Have you ever considered merging all your excellent cpu mining code into a project like bfgminer (which has horrible cpu support)? Would you be offended if someone else did that? I would love to only use one tool to mine if possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The maintainer of bfgminer asked me the same question a few months ago. Honestly I haven't used cgminer or any of its forks much, as I prefer programs that adhere to the KISS principle. Which is also one of the reasons why I like maintaining cpuminer.
I certainly wouldn't be offended if someone did that, as long as authorship is properly credited.
I understand the unix mentality of small programs to do discrete tasks. However, the bfgminer + multiminer + mobileminer ecosystem is quite nice. I might start on these efforts. In order to avoid code duplication maybe we can change cpuminer to provide a libcpuminer which bfgminer could link to.
Have you ever considered merging all your excellent cpu mining code into a project like bfgminer (which has horrible cpu support)? Would you be offended if someone else did that? I would love to only use one tool to mine if possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: