Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bfgminer collaboration/merge #65

Open
RyanHope opened this issue Feb 28, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

bfgminer collaboration/merge #65

RyanHope opened this issue Feb 28, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@RyanHope
Copy link

Have you ever considered merging all your excellent cpu mining code into a project like bfgminer (which has horrible cpu support)? Would you be offended if someone else did that? I would love to only use one tool to mine if possible.

@pooler
Copy link
Owner

pooler commented Feb 28, 2014

The maintainer of bfgminer asked me the same question a few months ago. Honestly I haven't used cgminer or any of its forks much, as I prefer programs that adhere to the KISS principle. Which is also one of the reasons why I like maintaining cpuminer.
I certainly wouldn't be offended if someone did that, as long as authorship is properly credited.

@RyanHope
Copy link
Author

I understand the unix mentality of small programs to do discrete tasks. However, the bfgminer + multiminer + mobileminer ecosystem is quite nice. I might start on these efforts. In order to avoid code duplication maybe we can change cpuminer to provide a libcpuminer which bfgminer could link to.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants