We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I am using wireproxy with Cloudflare WARP, I don't know if the performance depends on the CPU or if it depends on the connection with Cloudflare.
The thing is that with wireproxy I get about 50% of the speed of my ISP.
So I have tested two wireproxy instances with two different Socks5 ports:
wireproxy -c $HOME/.config/wireproxy-80801.conf wireproxy -c $HOME/.config/wireproxy-80802.conf
And I get 100% speed from my ISP.
So, if it is CPU it could be implemented in wireproxy the execution of multiple threads? Does anyone have experiences with this?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
WARP itself has speed limits and may not be able to reach 100% of your ISP's speed, so this test is unfair and the issue may not be with wireproxy.
WARP
wireproxy
To determine if it is a issue with wireproxy, first make sure that your wireguard endpoint is achieving the speeds you expect.
wireguard
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I am using wireproxy with Cloudflare WARP, I don't know if the performance depends on the CPU or if it depends on the connection with Cloudflare.
The thing is that with wireproxy I get about 50% of the speed of my ISP.
So I have tested two wireproxy instances with two different Socks5 ports:
And I get 100% speed from my ISP.
So, if it is CPU it could be implemented in wireproxy the execution of multiple threads? Does anyone have experiences with this?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: