You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In some cases it is beneficial to be able to grab a job id without populating its information yet.
Additional considerations on implementation:
Errors produced when attempting to retrieve information on a preallocated job
Expiration - so we can cleanup entries that were never populated
Possibility of requiring some information for preallocation. For example you could preallocate a job for a specific jobtype which might require certain fields to be populated.
In addition it may also be possible to use preallocation to do some very basic setup:
At this point each object's attributes could be modified and then posted back to the master without submitting the job. Ideally it could even be used to post-setup a job during something like the build step.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Comment by opalmer from Thursday Dec 19, 2013 at 06:21 GMT
Reopening, #30 broke this and it's something that needs to be revisited anyway because the post-checks are not explicit enough and there's quite a few new parts to the model.
Issue by opalmer from Thursday Sep 12, 2013 at 01:09 GMT
Originally opened as opalmer/deprecated-pyfarm-models#5
In some cases it is beneficial to be able to grab a job id without populating its information yet.
Additional considerations on implementation:
In addition it may also be possible to use preallocation to do some very basic setup:
At this point each object's attributes could be modified and then posted back to the master without submitting the job. Ideally it could even be used to post-setup a job during something like the build step.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: