Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mapping waterloop, bekken, owl, waterlichaamcategorietype, map #15

Open
damianooldoni opened this issue Apr 7, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
Labels
to be reviewed Review needed

Comments

@damianooldoni
Copy link
Contributor

damianooldoni commented Apr 7, 2022

I refer to the following columns of sheet meetplaatsen:

NL original field EN translation
waterloop waterbody
bekken basin
owl waterbodySurface
waterlichaamcategorietype waterbodyCategory

I grouped these water body categorization values in dynamicProperties within events.csv. These fields are not strictly speaking measurements or facts, so I preferred to group them in the JSON formatted field dynamicProperties.

Based on discussion with @peterdesmet, I also decided to not include kaart values as the reference to a map seems to me for internal use only.

Translation and decision to be reviewed by VMM.

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member

What do the codes stand for:

Bg	766
BgK	548
Bk	904
BkK	863
Bs	2
NVT	10
Pb	307
Pz	105
Rg	343
Rk	144
RtNt	79
Rzg	10

@damianooldoni
Copy link
Contributor Author

The codes on the left are water category types as defined by VMM (see below) and used in all Flanders by other institutes as well. The right ones (numbers) I cannot find where you found them.

Waterbody category meaning (NL)
Rzg zeer grote rivier
Pz zoete polderwaterloop
r rivier
BgK grote beek Kempen
BkK Kleine Beek kempen
RtNt probably linked to watercourses underlying a big change (waterlichaam = NA)
Rk - kleine rivier
Pb brakke polderwaterloop
Bk kleine beek
Bg grote beek
Rg grote rivier
NVT niet van toepassing (waterlichaam = NA)
Bs sterk brak meer

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member

The numbers are how often they occur, so don't worry about that. If those are codes as used by others, will leave them as is. A public reference for the codes could be useful though.

@damianooldoni
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, I would leave the codes as well. The problem is that I couldn't find a unique reference for these categories online. I got (most of) them by searching on Google one by one: e.g. searching "waterlichaam type rzg VMM" brings me to a publid VMM document (PDF) containing the evaluation of a waterbody: https://www.vmm.be/bestanden/geoloketdata/SGBP/Beoordeling2/VL11_203_Beoordeel2.pdf

The type is described on top:
image

I will ask to Stijn Van Onsem, the LIFE RIPARIAS contact person at VMM, if he can find a better complete reference to these codes.

@damianooldoni
Copy link
Contributor Author

Answer from Elina Bennetsen (VMM) via Stijn Van Onsem (VMM):

"""
Hier te vinden voor de 2e generatie stroomgebiedbeheerplannen : in de bestanden Vlaams deel van het internationaal stroomgebiedsdistrict Schelde en Vlaams deel van het internationaal stroomgebieddistrict Maas, beide onder 2. Analyses en beschermde gebieden (https://www.integraalwaterbeleid.be/nl/stroomgebiedbeheerplannen/stroomgebiedbeheerplannen-2016-2021/stroomgebiedbeheerplannen-voor-schelde-en-maas-2016-2021

Hier te vinden voor de 3e generatie stroomgebiedbeheerplannen (nog niet definitief goedgekeurd, maar is de meest up-to-date versie van de typologie): onder 2 analyses en beschermde gebieden -zowel hoofdtekst als bijlagen zullen info bevatten: https://www.volvanwater.be/documenten/beheerplan-vlaams-deel

Verder misschien interessant om het Achtergronddocument ‘beoordelingsmethoden’ bij de stroomgebiedbeheerplannen te bekijken als de macrofytendata worden gebruikt. Daarin staat beschrijving van meetstrategie plus uitleg over hoe per type gescoord wordt. Die info wordt per plancyclus up-to-date gebracht:

Versie van 2e sgbp: https://www.integraalwaterbeleid.be/nl/stroomgebiedbeheerplannen/stroomgebiedbeheerplannen-2016-2021/documenten/achtergronddocumenten/achtergronddocument-beoordeling-ecologische-en-chemische-toestand

Versie van 3e sgbp, zie pdf in bijlage (de achtergronddocumenten staan voorlopig niet meer online tot de finale goedkeuring van de plannen).
"""

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
to be reviewed Review needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants