You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now, this is maybe an issue if, or when, we get a critical mass of nodes tested with Ziggurat. What I'm after with the title is that if we should clearly distinguish the nodes by network or not, and how to show that information.
For example, should we show at a glance in the menu before any other details how many tests has a given node's latest version passed? Could this lead to us improperly advertising a node over others because of a "false positive" – more conforming numerically, but with one critical issue?
Food for thought for a redesign more than for this version of the UI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
JaniAnttonen
changed the title
Question/Discussion: Should we categorize node types by network?
Question/Discussion: Should we categorize nodes by network?
Dec 13, 2022
Now, this is maybe an issue if, or when, we get a critical mass of nodes tested with Ziggurat. What I'm after with the title is that if we should clearly distinguish the nodes by network or not, and how to show that information.
For example, should we show at a glance in the menu before any other details how many tests has a given node's latest version passed? Could this lead to us improperly advertising a node over others because of a "false positive" – more conforming numerically, but with one critical issue?
Food for thought for a redesign more than for this version of the UI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: