Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about pathway analysis #145

Open
kiwipeel opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Question about pathway analysis #145

kiwipeel opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@kiwipeel
Copy link

image

I copy pasted here the bulk data pathway activity tutorial plot. Here we see increase in MAPK pathway in condition 1 compared to condition 2 . Does it mean that this pathways really upregulated (activator genes high) in condition 1 or does it shows genes in this pathway(both supressor and activators) upregulated in condition 1 ?

Also should i use only significantly changed genes in DEGs , or can i use all of the DEGs ?

Thank you;

@PauBadiaM PauBadiaM self-assigned this Jan 10, 2025
@PauBadiaM
Copy link
Member

Hi @kiwipeel,

Very sorry for the delayed response, somehow I missed your issue!

Regarding your first question, it means that genes with positive weights are being upregulated, while genes with negative weights are being downregulated. You can look at this plot from the python's documentation to get an idea:

Regarding your second question, you should use all DEGs, as enrichment tests (this is an enrichment test) treat genes as observations and the bigger the N the better the estimate.

Hope this is helpful!

@PauBadiaM PauBadiaM added the question Further information is requested label Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants