You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Consider implementing a role that can setup a layer 4 Traefik router with optional tunnel/vpn container that routes traffic to a CGNAT home server.
Chosen solution will be HAProxy with Header and SNI based routing depending on the protocol used (HTTP/HTTPS) and will not be considering other protocols for now. So applications that need open ports outside of regular HTTP/HTTPS will not be covered by this initial implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Finally got around to looking at this and first solution will be deploying Wireguard and HAProxy on a server and then have that tunnel be the source of access to Traefik.
I will likely need testers for this to work out any setup kinks as far as usability goes. Feel free to reach out on discord if you are in this target audience and we haven't released this yet.
saltydk
changed the title
Alternate Traefik deployments
CGNAT self hosted Wireguard tunnel
Mar 24, 2024
Consider implementing a role that can setup a layer 4 Traefik router with optional tunnel/vpn container that routes traffic to a CGNAT home server.Chosen solution will be HAProxy with Header and SNI based routing depending on the protocol used (HTTP/HTTPS) and will not be considering other protocols for now. So applications that need open ports outside of regular HTTP/HTTPS will not be covered by this initial implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: