Automated Testing #45
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Given the age of SRecord, shell was the best answer for portability. With the usage of CMake, I would say native CMake tests are a nearby alternative. Python would be an additional dependency. So this must be actively decided. That being said: If the documentation is probably managed as |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Another topic would be naming: the numbers were generated by Aegis, which enforced it for every change. But today I would prefer some readable name. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Currently shell scrips make up a bulk of
ctest
back end for testing SRecord. What are opinions on using a different tool instead of shell, for example Python.With shell scripts, additional steps are required to setup a test environment on Windows. If Python could be used in place of shell scripts, then testing could be performed easily on platforms supported by Python.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions