You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the great tool. I have a set of species-level MAGs that range in completeness from 50-100% and redundancy/contamination 0-10%. These are species representatives chosen using dRep with a genome average ANI cutoff of 95%
Since these are environmental MAGs, I would like to construct my own database. Given the above numbers, can I include all MAGs or is it better to include only MAGs that are substantially complete say >70%? Also, to what extent does redundancy affect downstream steps such as calling SNPs?
Best,
Adi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the great tool. I have a set of species-level MAGs that range in completeness from 50-100% and redundancy/contamination 0-10%. These are species representatives chosen using dRep with a genome average ANI cutoff of 95%
Since these are environmental MAGs, I would like to construct my own database. Given the above numbers, can I include all MAGs or is it better to include only MAGs that are substantially complete say >70%? Also, to what extent does redundancy affect downstream steps such as calling SNPs?
Best,
Adi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: