You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm curious about step 1 of the strain tracking process and in particular, "Identify[ing] SNPs (particular nucleotide at a genomic site) that rarely occur in different unrelated samples". Does this mean that you input unrelated individuals (e.g., no twins, no siblings) or unrelated samples (e.g., no longitudinal samples) or both to increase the probability of identifying rare variants? In specific, in the case of mother-infant strain tracking, would you for example only put unrelated mother samples in step 1 of the process and then include the mothers and their infants in step 2? Or would you include a cross-sectional subset of mothers and infants in step 1 and then all samples in step 2? Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm curious about step 1 of the strain tracking process and in particular, "Identify[ing] SNPs (particular nucleotide at a genomic site) that rarely occur in different unrelated samples". Does this mean that you input unrelated individuals (e.g., no twins, no siblings) or unrelated samples (e.g., no longitudinal samples) or both to increase the probability of identifying rare variants? In specific, in the case of mother-infant strain tracking, would you for example only put unrelated mother samples in step 1 of the process and then include the mothers and their infants in step 2? Or would you include a cross-sectional subset of mothers and infants in step 1 and then all samples in step 2? Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: