Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Translation service for UUID <-> name.trio convention identifiers #107

Open
dang03 opened this issue Jul 11, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Comments

@dang03
Copy link
Contributor

dang03 commented Jul 11, 2016

Implementation of a service on the Catalogues that enables the transalation of a UUID to the name.trio convention identifier and viceversa through each descriptor API.

@dang03 dang03 added the feature label Jul 11, 2016
@jbonnet
Copy link
Member

jbonnet commented Jul 11, 2016

@dang03 Should this be available in the GKs API? Or is it simply an internal API?

@dang03
Copy link
Contributor Author

dang03 commented Jul 11, 2016

@jbonnet I'm not sure of what/who could use this service. It was a suggestion from @mbredel to have a service that translates UUIDs to name.trio and viceversa.
Most probably this should be available in the GKs API, then GK communicating to the service in the Catalogue.
What do you think?

@jbonnet
Copy link
Member

jbonnet commented Jul 11, 2016

@dang03 Well, I think it makes sense to have it on the GK API, controlling who can access it, etc.

@dang03 dang03 added this to the Preview v1.3 milestone Oct 27, 2016
@dang03 dang03 removed this from the Preview v1.3 milestone Jan 20, 2017
@dang03
Copy link
Contributor Author

dang03 commented Jan 20, 2017

With the one Catalogues concept, external platform users should not interact with the Catalogues using UUIDs (of internal usage, e.g: 65b416a6-46c0-4596...), instead they should interact with using the name.trio identifier (external usage, e.g: sonata-eu.firewall.1.0).
This is applicable to descriptors, however son-package files currently only use UUIDs.

@jbonnet
Copy link
Member

jbonnet commented Jan 20, 2017 via email

@dang03 dang03 closed this as completed Feb 15, 2018
@dang03 dang03 reopened this Feb 15, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants