You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Are these values recommended based on the training dataset and procedure of RetinaFace?
Or are these values which worked best for you?
More specifically, I don't know which value for max_size to choose for my personal dataset of mixed photos and hand-drawn/computer-assisted artworks. I am analysing 300x450 images. So, maybe I should upsample them 2x, and go for 900 max size.
As for the confidence threshold, I would settle for something closer to 0.5 (or even less, to detect hand-drawn faces), and lower the NMS threshold as well (to avoid detecting too many boxes). I understand that it might not be the case for people using the detector on natural photography. Do you think it is a bad idea to lower the threshold?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
Thank you for sharing this work as a PyPI package!
I have questions about default parameter values.
retinaface/retinaface/inference.py
Lines 39 to 43 in 29611c7
Are these values recommended based on the training dataset and procedure of RetinaFace?
Or are these values which worked best for you?
More specifically, I don't know which value for
max_size
to choose for my personal dataset of mixed photos and hand-drawn/computer-assisted artworks. I am analysing 300x450 images. So, maybe I should upsample them 2x, and go for 900 max size.As for the confidence threshold, I would settle for something closer to 0.5 (or even less, to detect hand-drawn faces), and lower the NMS threshold as well (to avoid detecting too many boxes). I understand that it might not be the case for people using the detector on natural photography. Do you think it is a bad idea to lower the threshold?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: