You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This could either be multiple inheritence or just a struct containin several sub-items
But the unique ClassA`vftable'{for `ClassB'} syntex (actually emitted by the compiler, not an IDA enrichment) makes me thing it's multiple inheritence.
RemoteNET is having a problem with that one because, for some reason, each of those symbols' names is only read as ClassAvftable'`
This causes the current logic to think each of those is the vftable of ClassA
It's important to note that each has a different address so using some dictionary/hashset is not automatically solving (or hiding) this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This could either be multiple inheritence or just a struct containin several sub-items
But the unique
ClassA`vftable'{for `ClassB'}
syntex (actually emitted by the compiler, not an IDA enrichment) makes me thing it's multiple inheritence.RemoteNET is having a problem with that one because, for some reason, each of those symbols' names is only read as
ClassA
vftable'`This causes the current logic to think each of those is the vftable of ClassA
It's important to note that each has a different address so using some dictionary/hashset is not automatically solving (or hiding) this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: